Brooks Men's Cascadia 14 Running Shoes

Product Information

Last but not least, if the Brooks Cascadia 16 received such high scores from the testers, it’s also because of the excellent ground feelit offers. Typically, you have to choose between cushion and proprioception. Well, not here! Conclusion All applicable customs and import duties and any other charges are the responsibility of the customer. The heel-to-toe drop is still 8 mm, which is relatively standard, and a good middle ground for most people.

I found the midsole to be cushioned but not mushy or yielding as Nike’s React Foam or ZoomX, for example. But it is definitely built for purpose and in that purpose performs very well. Delivery timescales are based on working days; Public Holidays, Saturday's and Sunday's are NOT classed as working days. While the midsole cushioning is softer, testers still note a hint of firmness. Clearly, on a scale of one to ten, with one being very firm and ten very soft, we are on six. The arch support is sufficient to be comfortable during long runs, regardless of your arch type. The internal saddle system gives the upper a secure fit; I’ve had no issues with my foot sliding around when negotiating rugged terrain ( Note: It helps that Size 12 fits me like a glove).

Brooks CASCADIA 16

The tongue is semi-gusseted on both sides with some stretchy mesh, giving these shoes a snug feel over the top of my foot without any restriction or pinching in the toes. Comfort could be better If you’ve got medium-volume feet (or slightly wider if you go with the 2E**) and are looking for a neutral trail shoe that is comfortable, versatile, and durable, then there is a fairly good chance that you may find the Cascadia 14’s to be suitable. However – and this is a big caveat – the only way you will know for certain is to give them a try in person. Yes, you have more weight, but also more rubber; in trail running, you gotta love the rubber as it means grip. Nice and comfortable

One of the classic complaints about the Cascadia is its weight. There are so many trail shoes out there that tip the scales more positively than Brooks’ long-running legacy trail shoe. In comparison with the previous model, Brooks managed to lose 1.2 pounds, a major improvement. I must admit, coming from road racing, I felt them to be quite heavy in hand. At 10.7oz / 303.3g, they are not light compared to road racing shoes, but in my opinion, weight is not an issue here. Cascadia's got the grip The RW Takeaway: The Cascadia 14 is lighter and more flexible than its predecessor, with reliable multi-surface traction. The Brooks Cascadia used to be the most popular shoe on the Pacific Crest Trail, and was an icon in the hiking world. The heyday of the Cascadia was with versions five through nine. With versions ten through thirteen, the popularity of the Cascadia seemed to evaporate. A lot of that had to do with the emergence of Altra and Hoka trail shoes, but the fitment and durability issues of the Cascadia v10-v13 can’t be overlooked. Despite the lost market share, Brooks appears to be committed to the Cascadia lineup, as can be seen with the revamped upper and outsole of the Cascadia 14. I’ve been testing the Cascadia 14 over the past few months, and will share my thoughts in this review.Ultimately they are not comfortable enough to do really long efforts in, my feet would be barking, and I’d prefer something with a bit more cushion underfoot if that was my main focus in these. Updated ride still a bit stiff